Monday 29 July 2024
Your weekly SQE Prep Quiz has arrived
Dear Subscriber,
I hope you had a great weekend. Please see below for the question, the answer to the previous question and associated resources. This is the web version of this newsletter.
Question: The UK government proposes a new law that significantly restricts the freedom of assembly and protest, citing national security concerns. The proposed law includes provisions that allow the police to pre-emptively detain individuals suspected of planning protests and to impose heavy fines on organizations that organize unauthorized gatherings. Several human rights groups argue that the proposed law infringes on fundamental freedoms protected under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Human Rights Act 1998.
Which of the following principles is most relevant in determining the constitutionality of the proposed law under the UK’s legal framework?
- The principle of parliamentary sovereignty
- The principle of proportionality
- The principle of the separation of powers
- The principle of judicial review
- The principle of the rule of law
Study Material: For more on the topic of this week’s question see the video linked here and if you are looking for* a relevant title, see here.
Free Study Planner: You can download our SQE1 Study Planner for the January 2025 exam by clicking here.
Answer and feedback to last week’s question: Samantha decides to purchase a vintage car from Classic Motors Ltd. Before the sale, the salesperson at Classic Motors Ltd. tells Samantha that the car has only 20,000 miles on the odometer and has never been in an accident. The salesperson knew this not to be the case, but was keen to make a sale in order to impress her boss. Relying on these statements, Samantha purchases the car for £25,000. After a few weeks, the car suffers a break down. Samantha takes the car to her mechanic for repair, only to discover that the car has actually travelled 80,000 miles and has been involved in a major accident that was not disclosed. Feeling cheated, Samantha wants to take legal action against Classic Motors Ltd. for misrepresentation.
Which of the following best describes the type of misrepresentation Samantha has likely encountered, and the remedies available to her?
- Fraudulent misrepresentation; Samantha can rescind the contract and claim damages, including damages for any losses caused by the misrepresentation.
- Negligent misrepresentation; Samantha can rescind the contract and claim damages, including consequential losses under the Misrepresentation Act 1967.
- Innocent misrepresentation; Samantha can choose to rescind the contract or claim damages, but not both.
- Fraudulent misrepresentation; Samantha can choose to rescind the contract and claim damages, including exemplary damages to punish Classic Motors Ltd.
- Negligent misrepresentation; Samantha can claim damages under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 but cannot rescind the contract if the court deems it unreasonable.
Correct Answer: 1. Fraudulent misrepresentation; Samantha can rescind the contract and claim damages, including damages for any losses directly caused by the misrepresentation. Feedback: In this scenario, Samantha has likely encountered fraudulent misrepresentation. Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when a false representation is made knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly as to whether it is true or false, with the intent to deceive. The salesperson at Classic Motors Ltd. provided false information about the car’s mileage and accident history, which Samantha relied upon in making her purchase. As a result of fraudulent misrepresentation, Samantha has the right to rescind the contract, which would nullify the agreement and restore both parties to their pre-contractual positions. Additionally, she can claim damages for any additional losses, for example mechanic’s costs, loss of income etc.
Option 2 describes negligent misrepresentation, which involves a false statement made without reasonable grounds for believing its truth. Although damages can be claimed, rescission is generally the main remedy. Here, as the salesperson knew the information to be false, it is not a matter of negligence. Option 3 involves innocent misrepresentation, where the misrepresentation was made without fault; This does not match the facts. Option 4 suggests exemplary damages, which are rare in English law and not typically awarded for misrepresentation. Option 5 again deals with negligent misrepresentation but suggests that rescission may be unavailable if deemed unreasonable by the court. Rescission being the main remedy, this is not correct. Therefore, the correct and most comprehensive answer is that Samantha can rescind the contract and claim damages, including damages for any losses caused by the misrepresentation due to fraudulent misrepresentation.
Thank you for subscribing and let me know how you are getting on in your preparation through our Facebook Group. Feel free to forward this email to anyone you think will benefit.
If you wish to unsubscribe: You can stop receiving the newsletter at any time by emailing us at newsletter@glintiss.co.uk with ‘unsubscribe’ as the subject. We will promptly remove your email address from our mailing list. Thank you for being with us.
You will hear from me again soon.
All the best
Dr Ioannis Glinavos
*As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Leave a Reply